NAD C372 Amplifier

In the '80s, NAD made its name on the rear of budget amplifiers such as the infamous 3020. They price pocket money were scrawny, and were not very well put together, but they seemed miles better than the dominant Japanese competitors despite their low power output. Does it outpace its rivals like its illustrious forebears?

Boasting 150W per channel, in the cost the C372 is likely in a category when it comes to power output of its own. Those are watts that is suitable, also.

But in the event that you plan to get the eyes of neighbours and buddies, you will want over two of these, or even kit them out off the bottom of a chopped-down, large-rimmed Mazda 323 from with those illogical neon tubes. NAD shines in the art of drab hifi, and these gray oblongs look nearly camouflaged. The vibe is no nonsense and down-to-company.

You can not miss the attributes on this machine, although it might not be flash. The last are a mixed blessing: I 'd no use for them and changed them out of the signal route, although they do not degrade the signal significantly. In the instance is a Class A preamp, NAD as well as a fine large toroidal transformer by Holmgren.

When you take into account the characteristics as well as the cost weighing down this amp, you ought to expect only a passable amount of sound reproduction. In NAD fashion that is typical, yet, you get a whole lot more. The sound is really refined - not in the least little bruising. Spinning an old faithful just like the Remedy's Mixed Up through the C542 CD player of NAD, an all-natural partner for this amp, I used to be quite pleasantly surprised from the amount of detail retrieval. Flat positioning and soundstage width is extremely powerful, and colouration is quite low, with no tradeoff of homogenized sound or compressed.

Besides the flexibility, as well as the system of the C372 control advantages of possessing one in an all-NAD system, many prospective buyers will probably be looking at those output signal data and thinking about creating block-rocking beats. High power levels may also appeal in copying the dynamics of a live concert or the scale of an orchestra. The NAD keeps its composure, and definitely provides in this respect. I guess the generous manner with voltage and current of the NAD additionally leads to its comparatively high resolution when managing low-sensitivity loudspeakers like my midget Fortresses.

Perhaps there might be more catch to transients, perhaps a bit more could be muscled up by the bass guitar, perhaps the soundstage is a little on the shallow side. Careful choice of sources, speakers, and cables might resolves all these quibbles. The truth is this amp does an extremely sound job, conveying the music it is fed in fashion that is commendable. If it does not quite step into the world of its more high-priced brethren that are incorporated, that is nothing to whine about.

So who is this one for? My estimate is the first-time 'appropriate' system-builder (ie not your typical loan-loaded tertiary pupil), needing a "safe bet" high fidelity system. In other words, a system using a source-friendly amp one, at its center capable of driving just about anything without worry, and with enough foil in reservation for development in the event the bug bites. But when you'd like to pull on girls, get among them lowriding Mazdas.